Wednesday, June 26, 2024 | News
During the darkest hours of the pandemic, when knowledge workers were forced to work from home and managers were wondering how to use technology to raise employee engagement and performance in a virtual work environment, Kelly Beckner, vice president of human resources at MBO Partners, fleetingly thought about employee monitoring tools.
Headquartered in Ashburn, Va., MBO Partners is a direct sourcing platform that enables enterprise organizations and independent professionals to work efficiently together. The company has an all-remote workforce of approximately 240 full-time employees and 520 contract workers.
Beckner said during the pandemic, MBO executives were aware that many companies were adopting monitoring tools that closely examine, for example, how many times a worker clicks their computer mouse, how long they stay on a website or how many emails they've sent. That was one way of tracking remote workers, but this was a strategy that Beckner and her colleagues rejected.
"It was never at the forefront of our thought process because we knew our workforce and how we wanted to engage with them," she said. "In fact, when it was brought up, the collective thought was it would actually erode our culture to monitor people in that way. To have people feel as if their movements and their contributions to the company were being so closely reviewed was not worth the risk."
To collect employee data on sentiment, performance and engagement during the pandemic, MBO Partners invested in software from Seattle-based TINYpulse (now Limeade Listening), which offers an employee engagement and feedback platform that provides surveys and helps employers create their own questionnaires.
The company also began using 7Geese, a performance management platform that tracks employees' individual performance as well as the collaborative efforts of a team, and Awardco's platform for employee rewards and recognition.
"If I were asked to reconsider monitoring tools, my first question would be, 'Would the impact of implementing monitoring tools erode the trust relationship that we have with our employees?' I would also then ask myself, 'Does adding a monitoring tool improve the employee experience? Does it improve employee productivity, and does it improve my ability to attract and retain our talent?' " Beckner said.
Monitoring tools today are being applied to a workforce that has fundamentally changed over the last three and a half years. The time has come for companies to question the use of monitoring tools and their validity in today's workplace, said David Johnson, principal analyst covering the employee experience at Cambridge, Mass.-based Forrester Research.
"I think it's fair for employers to ask: 'Are monitoring tools increasing employee satisfaction? Has employee engagement gone up or gone down since we made all these policy changes and put in these monitoring tools?' " Johnson said.
Johnson is particularly pained when he hears monitoring software vendors say their tools can measure employee productivity. Employers need to understand the limitations of employee surveillance tools, he added.
"If a vendor says, 'We can measure productivity and we can tell you about the productivity of your knowledge workers,' that's a red flag," Johnson said.
Employee monitoring tools can tell you how intensively an employee uses emails, Microsoft Teams or other tools to communicate with other employees, he added, but they can't tell an employer anything about productivity and effectiveness, even though they are marketed as though they can.
For example, consider two software developers: one who writes 100 lines of code a day and the other who writes 10 lines of code daily.
Working one job is difficult enough but taking on two at once is a mighty task that moonlighting employees understand best. Lately, conversations around employees moonlighting at work have gained traction as the workforce moved online and many found time on their hands instead of sufficient living wages. If you’re wondering “What is employee moonlighting?” then the term moonlighting refers to an employee with multiple jobs. Most of us with full-time time jobs might log out of work and go back home to take a breather. Those with a moonlighting career log of one full-time position to start working on their side jobs.
Companies are often disapproving of moonlighting employees for multiple reasons but there aren’t always ways for them to interfere with these additional jobs. Some would even say it’s unethical to try to do so. But it does put employers in a tricky position when their own company risks facing losses when an employee is distracted by external responsibilities. This is where moonlighting policies come in.
According to Etymonline, the term moonlighting refers to the practice of “holding a second job, especially at night” derived from the idea of working by the light of the moon. There is no clear evidence for when the word first came into use but the use of the term is becoming increasingly common today. Many part-time workers are already familiar with working multiple jobs at one go but the trend of full-time employees doing the same is a more common trend in recent years. A U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics summary indicates that the number of workers with multiple jobs in the U.S. has risen to 7.8 million in 2023.
A moonlighting employee might work in the same field as their main job—a digital design expert taking on freelance projects for customers other than their employer. A moonlighting employee might also take on a completely unrelated side job, such as a full-time lawyer taking to writing and content generation after work hours. Some moonlighting can have multiple side jobs, hard as it is to pull off successfully. Regardless of the dynamic, employees moonlighting at work have their reasons for doing it.
Moonlighting employees either do what they do because of a want or a need. Either they want to spend their time on another job for varying reasons or they need to because they don’t have a choice. Both reasons for taking up side gigs are equally valid. More detailed reasons include:
It is very evident that moonlight is appealing to employees and there are multiple reasons for it. From income to engagement, employee moonlighting at work may be much happier overall because they have the assurance of their needs being met one way or another. However, if you’ve ever worked a full-time job, you know the realities of burnout and that a job is never a nine-to-five investment. It often spills into your life in many other ways. Working multiple jobs can mean no breaks to recover from any of them.
Nearly 5 percent of the U.S. workforce is made up of moonlighting employees and it is possible because there are no laws in the country against it. Employees are free to work multiple jobs if they choose to do it. In some cases, an employment contract signed at the start of employment at a company might specifically restrict an employee from seeing work outside of the company to protect the interest of the business as a whole.
However, these and similar non-compete agreements are not enforceable everywhere and depend on the state laws regarding their enforcement. This does not free employees to do as they please either. Employment in the U.S. is automatically “at will” and this means that either party can terminate the employment at any time. While this gives employees the freedom to quit at will, it also increases the possibility of a dissatisfied employer severing ties with an employee moonlighting at work. Unless the employee can prove that the termination was along discriminatory lines protected by the law, there is little that can be done to protest against the termination.
Employers do allow some amount of restraint in their choice to take action against moonlighting employees. Often, unless there are clear signs of the work quality being affected, a conflict of interest, or the company resources being misused, employers will often overlook an employee moonlighting at work.
Designing an effective moonlighting policy is difficult and getting employees to sign legally binding documents in agreement with it is even harder. Many workers who aren’t even considering becoming moonlighting employees might reject an offer simply because they do not want to sign binding contracts and find the policy an unfair restriction of their personal freedom. Undeniably, what an employee does with their free time is their business.
For employers who are worried about data leaks for specific roles where the employees handle very sensitive data, it can be much easier to employ a confidentiality agreement or a non-compete agreement to prevent the employee from working with direct competitors, while still allowing them the option to work in an unrelated field if they wish to do it.
Ensuring clear guidelines for performance quality and employee evaluations, and then conducting regular assessments can provide a detailed snapshot of an employee’s performance. If their work is suffering, regardless of whether it’s caused by another job or disinterest in their work, action can be taken. Performance improvement plans (PIP) can be set into motion to address the quality of work, which is the main concern for the employer.
For other employees, employers might be better off working on adjacent company policies instead of looking to enforce a moonlighting policy on their workforce. Non-solicitation policies can be enforced to prevent employees from advertising their other business to anyone within the workplace. Similarly, guidelines can be clearly specified for the use of company resources to restrict misuse as well, even for moonlighting employees.
If a company wants to stop its workforce from turning into moonlighting employees, then ensuring they have what they need at work can be a big step in the right direction. Employees do largely turn to outside work for financial assistance and paying employees fair wages should be a basic criterion. In addition, providing them with training and growth opportunities, fulfilling work experience, addressing their development, etc. can also help employees meet all the employment criteria and ensure their best interests are prioritized within the company itself. It’s a win for everyone involved.
Navigating the shifting winds of work and labor can be a difficult task but it is an essential one. Moonlighting employees have thrived for years and they will continue to do so, regardless of whether it lasts as a popular trend or not. Especially for those with financial needs or those pursuing passion projects outside of work, moonlight remains an essential experience and it is unlikely they will give it up. For employers who want a better grasp of the situation, it is important to consider why your employees are turning to moonlighting after work. If there is something that can be done to support them, it might be fruitful to consider trying it out.
Source : https://www.thehrdigest.com/moonlighting-is-no-longer-just-for-vigilantes-moonlight-employees-are-on-the-rise/